Putting Humans at the Innovation Health Care Hub

For a long time, the healthcare industry has focused on conventional linear innovation models: basic and applied research accompanied by growth and marketing. While this approach to ‘lab-bench to bedside’ has transformed healthcare internationally, it can take years, even decades, for innovation, often with little feedback from patients themselves, to get to the market. The findings may be theoretically sound, but from the point of view of the patient, sub-optimal (as any woman who endured a painful mammogram understands).

An alternative emerging at healthcare institutions worldwide is human-centered design and co-creation, a set of approaches that can accelerate and humanize healthcare innovation. This model isn’t just about getting greater patient feedback during the innovation process. Patients are co-designers, co-developers, and increasingly more responsible for their own and collective health outcomes.

THE INNOVATION CENTRES

For a long time, the healthcare industry has focused on conventional linear innovation models: basic and applied research accompanied by growth and marketing. While this approach to ‘lab-bench to bedside’ has transformed healthcare internationally, it can take years, even decades, for innovation, often with little feedback from patients themselves, to get to the market. The findings may be theoretically sound, but from the point of view of the patient, sub-optimal (as any woman who endured a painful mammogram understands).

A team of in-house designers will be hired by the Mayo Clinic Center for Creativity (CFI). Under the Mayo Clinic banner slogan, "the patient’s needs come first it uses human-centered design to improve healthcare delivery. Projects including redesigning over 100 years and developing flagship offers have been conducted by interdisciplinary teams of service designers, physicians, project managers, innovation coordinators, hospital staff members and patients.

The Challenges
1. Establishing new project selection strategies:
Centers are struggling to recognize and rate challenges, proposals or initiatives that are likely to lead to meaningful health and system performance. Two syndromes can be harmful to project selection in healthcare.
2. Scoping performance initiatives and ambition management:
By default, inter-disciplinary design teams are optimistic and positive. However, out of a passion, they may end up taking on duties above and beyond the call of duty.
3. Managing physicians, designers, engineers, and company managers of multi-stakeholder teams.
Diverse stakeholders, particularly in their prescribed positions, often bring contrasting motivations, viewpoints and approaches to collaborative design projects.
4. To show immediate value, navigating pressures
Sponsors of innovation initiatives frequently want breakthrough, revolutionary or disruptive innovation, but struggle to express what it implies or endorse the timeframes needed for longer than anticipated.
5. Creation of relevant performance metrics and attribution assignment
Innovation is inherently risky, which makes it difficult to develop bottom-line sales and time-frame goals. For teams, unrealistic or non-existent economic and non-financial goals and aspirations may be demoralizing.
6.Identifying and encouraging implementation paths
The outcomes of successful innovation initiatives, such as discovering a product, service or analysis, frequently involve different kinds and degrees of support.

2 Likes

Health innovation is to develop new or improved health policies, systems, products and technologies, and services and delivery methods that improve people’s health, with a special focus on the needs of vulnerable populations. WHO engages in health innovation in the context of universal health coverage.

1 Like